Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom • The Authorized Lock

Current in the course of the case:

  1. President Abraham; Vice-President Yusuf
  2. Judges Owada, Tomka, Bennouna, Canado Trindade, Greenwood, Xue, Donoghue,
  3. Gaja, Callinde, Bhandari, Robinson, Crawford, Gevorgian;
  4. Decide advert hoc Bedjaoui; Registrar Couvreur.

The Marshall Islands:

The Marshall Island formally often called the Republic of Marshall Islands (Republic of Marshall Island) is an island nation close to the equator of the Pacific Ocean, One impact of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) initiative is to carry on the insurance policies of the nuclear weapons states, which declare to be dedicated to a make the world freed from Nuclear Weapons and never exhibiting the slightest willingness to succeed in that objective on the identical time into the highlight.

Transient of Details:

On 24 April 2014, Purposes have been filed towards 9 States (China, Democratic Individuals’s Republic of Korea, France, India, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, United Kingdom of Nice Britain and Northern Eire and USA) by the Republic of the Marshall Islands, accusing them of not abiding by their obligations with respect to nuclear disarmament and to the cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date.

Whereas all these 9 functions have been associated to the identical matter, the Marshall Islands distinguished between India, Pakistan and the UK who had acknowledged the obligatory jurisdiction of the Court docket, and the six others, in respect of which the Marshall Islands proposed to discovered the jurisdiction of the Court docket on consent which was but to be given.

The Purposes filed towards these 6tra States have been conveyed to them however not entered within the Normal Listing, and motion was not taken within the proceedings within the absence of their consent.

With consideration to the instances filed within the Normal Listing, the Marshall Islands extra particularly accused the UK of the violation of Article 6 (Every of the Events to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good religion on efficient measures referring to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a treaty on common and full disarmament underneath strict and efficient worldwide management.) of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and each have been get together to it.

Though India and Pakistan have been non-parties of the NPT, sure obligations enacted in that instrument utilized to all States as a matter of typical worldwide regulation asserted the Marshall Islands, and such was the case of the obligations offered for in Article 6 of the NPT .

The courtroom was knowledgeable by India and Pakistan that the Marshall Island’s Utility was unacceptable as they thought of that it had no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute claimed by the Marshall Islands, these questions have to be resolved first was stated by the Court docket, earlier than any proceedings. Subsequently written pleadings have been filed on the questions by the events throughout the mounted time restrict.

The Court docket time barred The Republic of the Marshall Islands for submitting the Memorial and United Kingdom for the Counter-Memorial within the proceedings that was set in movement towards the UK. Nonetheless, United Kingdom added sure Preliminary objections within the case throughout the time-limit of three months following the submitting of the Applicant’s Memorial, the. Consequently, the proceedings on the deserves have been suspended, and written statements of observations and submissions have been offered by the Marshall Islands on the Preliminary Objections put up by the UK.

Public hearings have been held in all 3 instances in March 2016, and on 5 October 2016 the judgment was delivered by the courtroom on every case.

Points Raised:

ISSUE 1: The Normal Meeting and the Safety Council resolutions acknowledges the existence of an obligation underneath Customary Worldwide Legislation upon all states to barter in good religion of nuclear disarmament.

ISSUE 2: Breach of obligations regarding negotiation referring to cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Armament by UK.


In every of the three Judgments the Court docket thought of that the preliminary objections of that’s primarily based on the absence of a dispute between the Events in the intervening time the Purposes have been filed, given by the responded States ought to be upheld.

It was additionally famous by the courtroom that dispute can exist provided that the each side have to be holding clearly completely different views with respect to the query of the efficiency or non-performance of some worldwide obligations. It additional famous {that a} dispute exists when the proof signifies that the respondent had the data, or couldn’t have had the data, that its views have been positively opposed by the applicant.

Ultimately, the courtroom additionally noticed that, in precept, the date of submission of the applying to the courtroom determines the existence of a dispute.

Having examined the statements and conduct of the each side in every of the instances, it was thought of by the Court docket that they didn’t give a base for locating a dispute between each the States in every case in entrance of the Court docket. Since Article 36, paragraph 2, of its Statute says the Court docket didn’t have jurisdiction, so it couldn’t proceed to the deserves of those instances.


In April 2014 the Republic of the Marshall Islands approached to the Worldwide Court docket of Justice and Instituted proceedings towards 9 completely different international locations and United Kingdom was additionally one in all them.

The Republic of the Marshall Islands claimed that the United Kingdoms has breached the Article 6 of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of nuclear weapons (NPT) which says that events are to have bona fide negotiations on “efficient measures” for the “cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date”.

The UK and different international locations viz. India and Pakistan raised some preliminary objections like:

i) the absence in existence of a authorized dispute;

ii) the “indispensable events” within the proceedings have been absent;

iii) reservations of their respective declarations accepting the Court docket’s jurisdiction; and

iv) it lacked sensible final result of a judgment on the deserves. It was held by the courtroom that the preliminary objections by the respondent international locations that bases on absence of dispute between the events ought to prevail.

It additionally stated that existence of dispute between the international locations is barely doable once they have clear reverse views, additionally that existence of dispute relies upon when the proof says that one get together was conscious that its views are opposed by the opposite get together aside from this existence of dispute additionally will depend on date of software of the problem.

By inspecting the info and assertion by each the events it was discovered that the Worldwide Court docket of Justice doesn’t have jurisdiction within the case as stated by Article 36, Paragraph 2 of its statute.


The worldwide courtroom of justice (right here and after ICJ), the precept judicial organ of United Nations within the Three instances filed by The Republic of Marshall Islands towards India, United Kingdom and Pakistan Respectively, with regard to obligations regarding negotiations referring to cessation of the nuclear arms race and to the nuclear disarmament.

It was held the preliminary objections of the respondent States are primarily based on the absence of a dispute between the Events in the intervening time the functions have been filed ought to be upheld. Moreover, it was opined that ICJ doesn’t have any jurisdiction on this case.



Leave a Comment